Readme
Execution is not implicit. It is enforced.
Enforced execution continuity across models, sessions, and environments.
Most systems execute. They cannot prove that execution remains valid after failure.
When a batch of actions partially succeeds and then fails, most systems leave the partial result committed. There is no rollback. There is no structural detection. The system continues from a state it cannot justify.
This is not a bug in any one implementation. It is the default behavior when execution correctness is not structurally enforced.
ContinuumPort makes these failure modes unexecutable under enforcement.
git clone https://github.com/giorgioroth/ContinuumPort
cd ContinuumPort/quickstart
# I2 — domain integrity (invalid input never becomes executable)
python run_address_invariant.py
# I4 — atomicity (no partial state escape)
python run.py
# I5 — determinism (same input → same output)
python run_determinism.pyRuns in seconds. No dependencies.
============================================================
CONTINUUMPORT — ADDRESS INVARIANT DEMO
Invariant: I2 — Domain Integrity
============================================================
Scenario: an address is submitted for execution.
One is valid. One contains a minimal corruption — a single uppercase character.
[NaiveSystem — superficial validation]
valid_addr accepted: True
corrupted_addr accepted: True
✗ I2 VIOLATED — structurally invalid address entered execution domain
[StrictSystem — structural validation]
valid_addr accepted: True
corrupted_addr accepted: False
✓ I2 ENFORCED — corrupted address removed from execution domain
invalid address → execution never becomes admissible
The system does not reject the action. The action does not exist.
============================================================
CONTINUUMPORT — EXECUTION INVARIANT DEMO
Invariant: I4 — No partial state escape
============================================================
Scenario: a batch of two actions is submitted.
Action 1 succeeds. Action 2 fails.
A compliant system must behave atomically: all or nothing.
[FaultyAdapter — no rollback]
Committed : False
State before: {'account': 'active', 'balance': 100}
State after : {'account': 'active', 'balance': 100, 'processed': True}
✗ I4 VIOLATED — partial state escaped
[ReferenceAdapter — atomic rollback]
Committed : False
State before: {'account': 'active', 'balance': 100}
State after : {'account': 'active', 'balance': 100}
✓ I4 ENFORCED — rollback complete
Execution failure is not the problem. Invalid state after failure is.
============================================================
CONTINUUMPORT — DETERMINISM DEMO
Invariant: I5 — Deterministic outcome
============================================================
Scenario: identical input is executed twice from identical state.
[FaultyAdapter — order-dependent execution]
Run 1 result: {'x': 2}
Run 2 result: {'x': 1}
✗ I5 VIOLATED — same input, different outputs
[ReferenceAdapter — declared order enforced]
Run 1 result: {'x': 2}
Run 2 result: {'x': 2}
✓ I5 ENFORCED — identical output
Across these three demos:
- invalid input is accepted
- execution becomes inconsistent
- state becomes corrupted
ContinuumPort eliminates all three — structurally.
ContinuumPort is an execution validity protocol.
It enforces that state transitions cannot violate declared invariants across time, even when execution spans multiple models, sessions, or environments.
ContinuumPort defines continuity of state. Regen Engine enforces that continuity at execution time.
Every transition must satisfy:
- I1 — No unauthorized execution
- I2 — No out-of-domain execution
- I3 — No invalid state transition
- I4 — No partial state escape
- I5 — Deterministic outcome
If any invariant is violated:
execution is rejected
class RegenAdapter(ABC):
def reset(self, state: dict) -> None: ...
def snapshot(self) -> dict: ...
def execute(self, actions: list[dict]) -> ExecutionResult: ...
def simulate(self, state: dict, action: dict) -> dict: ...Full invariant suite (651 tests):
0 invariant violations (reference implementation under adversarial conditions).
Under enforcement:
- partial execution
- non-determinism
- invalid input entering execution
- state corruption after failure
These are structurally impossible.
ContinuumPort enforces correctness of execution under declared constraints.
It does not guarantee:
- correctness of intent
- correctness of constraints
- external side effects
compliance/
quickstart/
run.py
run_determinism.py
run_address_invariant.py
Execution either commits correctly — or does not happen.
There is no residual state.
If your system executes, test it.
Gh. Rotaru (Giorgio Roth) — Independent researcher
Comments
Post a Comment